Was it Yogi Berra who said, “The best way to stay ahead is not to get behind?” He might have, but if so he would have been talking about baseball, not investing in stocks. His simple words of wisdom, however, are appropriate for this subject: downside protection in the stock market. One of the more favorable aspects of investing in dividend-paying stocks is their ability to help protect capital in declining stock markets.
For long-term investors, nothing disrupts investment returns like periods of significantly negative returns. Dividends can represent a meaningful oﬀset to these periods because they assist in the powerful phenomenon of compounding. Albert Einstein once called compound interest the “eighth wonder of the world,” but for compounding to work to its fullest benefit, positive returns, or at least smaller negative returns, must occur year in and year out. The reason downside protection is so important is because of asymmetry and simple math. For a given percentage decline in portfolio value, the gain must exceed the loss to get back to even. For example, an investment portfolio that goes down by 30% has to increase by 43% to get back to the previous level of value. We believe that both Yogi and Einstein would agree that downside protection is an important consideration for investors.
Dividend-paying stocks have historically declined less when the market goes down. This has to do with a number of features of dividend-paying stocks, and three in particular:
There are two components of return from stocks: income and either appreciation or depreciation. If a company pays a dividend and is able to maintain it, the income portion of the return will always be positive. When all stocks are declining, the decline in dividend-paying stocks will be mitigated by the cash distributed to shareholders, which provides a cushion to the return each year. The amount to which the decline is reduced is dependent upon a number of factors, not the least of which is the amount of the dividend.
It is also significant that dividend-paying companies tend to have more stable underlying businesses. The implication is that a less risky company will imply a share price that is less volatile. Many of the traditional dividend-paying sectors of the market are thought of as less volatile than the average stock (e.g., Consumer Staples, Utilities, and Health Care). These businesses tend to be less volatile since their products are in continuous demand and are less influenced by the state of the economy. They reflect their more stable nature by having very strong and consistent dividend records, often with annual increases in the payout. These are thought of as “defensive” sectors, and typically they act as such in a market decline.
To the third point, investors tend to appreciate dividends more when markets decline and volatility is heightened. The reason for this is simple: the dividend component of return is always positive and people tend to appreciate certainty to the greatest extent in periods of instability. While we believe underlying company fundamentals are crucial to the success of any long-term investment, investor sentiment can have a significant effect on stock market returns. While we appreciate the dividend and maintain a consistent philosophy in all market environments, this tendency to seek assurance in times of market stress only further serves to reduce our strategies’ losses in a down market.
The Power of Protection. Over time, consistent dividend-paying companies have proven to be much better investments than companies with less-than- consistent dividends or none at all. We looked at the performance of dividend-paying stocks versus that of non-dividend-paying stocks since 1980, the year our firm was founded. What we found is that dividend payers experienced more months, quarters, and years of positive returns. As previously mentioned, the more frequently investments can earn positive returns, the greater the extent to which compounding can work wonders for a portfolio.
Of course, this means they experienced fewer periods with negative returns, as well. Dividend payers experienced 41 fewer months and 16 fewer quarters of negative performance than their non-dividend-paying counterparts, to be exact. Not only that, but the degree of decline between dividend payers and non-dividend payers was quite significant, as well. As previously mentioned, no two periods of negative returns are alike, and the greater the degree of negativity, the greater the required return to recovery. In quarters where non-dividend payers went down more than 10%, dividend payers outperformed by approximately 8%. This is a tremendous differential, given the power of reverse compounding. This vivid example represents a good part of the relative return superiority of dividend payers over the longer term.
Conclusion. It is difficult to overstate the importance of downside protection for a long-term investment program. We feel preservation of capital should always be a part of one’s investment goals. Investing in dividend-paying stocks, especially those that maintain and raise the dividend consistently, is an excellent way to achieve investment objectives. Dividends provide income, and as the dividends grow, they can force the price of a stock upward while protecting capital on the downside. Serious, long-term investors should carefully consider the merits of investing in companies that have the ability to pay dividends and raise them consistently.
Crawford Investment Counsel (“Crawford”) is an independent investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Crawford, including our investment strategies, fees, and objectives, can be found in our Form ADV Part 2and/or Form CRS, which is available upon request.
The opinions expressed are those of Crawford. The opinions referenced are as of the date of the commentary and are subject to change, without notice, due to changes in the market or economic conditions and may not necessarily come to pass. There is no guarantee of the future performance of any Crawford portfolio. Crawford reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs.
The opinions expressed herein are those of Crawford Investment Counsel and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to sell any product. Forward-looking statements cannot be guaranteed. This document may contain certain information that constitutes “forward-looking statements” which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “expect,” “will,” “hope,” “forecast,” “intend,” “target,” “believe,” and/or comparable terminology. No assurance, representation, or warranty is made by any person that any of Crawford’s assumptions, expectations, objectives, and/or goals will be achieved. Nothing contained in this document may be relied upon as a guarantee, promise, assurance, or representation as to the future. Crawford Investment Counsel is an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training.
You are now leaving the Crawford Investment Counsel website and accessing the
Crawford Investment Funds website.
You are now entering the area of the Crawford Investment Counsel website
that is for Consultant & Investment Professional Use Only.
You are now leaving the Crawford Investment Funds website and accessing the
Ultimus Fund Solutions website.
You are now entering the area of the Crawford Investment Counsel website
that is for Endowment & Foundation Use Only.